Augmenting ongoing depression care with a mutual peer support intervention versus self-help materials alone: A randomized trial

Auteurs

Marcia Valenstein, Paul N Pfeiffer, Samantha Brandfon, Heather Walters, Dara Ganoczy, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Jay L Cohen, Winnetha Benn-Burton, Elaine Carroll, Jennifer Henry, Elizabeth Garcia, Brittany Risk, Helen C Kales, John D Piette, Michele Heisler.

Résumé

Objective: Various models of peer support may be implemented in mental health settings. This randomized trial assessed the effectiveness of a telephone-delivered mutual peer support intervention. Methods: A total of 443 patients receiving ongoing depression treatment from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs were enrolled in either enhanced usual care (N = 243) or the peer support intervention (N = 200). Intent-to-treat analyses assessed outcomes at six months postenrollment, excluding 56 patients who experienced an unplanned telephone platform shutdown. Results: At baseline, patients had substantial depressive symptoms, functional limitations, and low quality of life. Both groups showed significant clinical improvements at six months, with no significant differences by group. Conclusions: Telephone-delivered mutual peer support for patients with depression did not improve outcomes beyond those observed with enhanced usual care. Other peer support models, with more "professionalized" peers delivering a structured curriculum, may be more effective. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)


Retour à la recherche